We are missing so many stories about our ancestors due to Abysmal Transcriptions. Yes, I can edit and update existing garbage to make more sense, but that does not help me find articles in the first place. If what is transcribed isn't anything approaching what is printed, the article will never be found except by sheer chance. Occasionally I have found an article by chance, then copied the image into google keep where it does a far better job of transcription than what is on this site. Now that there is AI (or rather large language models) the transcriptions from any of the specialised sites is superior to that.

Why focus on new newspapers when there is already a treasure trove of unfindable information in what you have already scanned. Focus on re-doing older papers before starting new ones.

For example - Bucksey (BCCKSBY or B<Kkiwr) and Househam (HOCSEHAM or Houehm), Dickinson (Dickinaoo) and Murchie (MurAie) are unlikely to ever find this record unless someone edits it for you.
The only reason the middle marriage is correct is because I edited it - ONE of the 3 words Barton was correctly spelled!